There were many controversies that were generated and continue to be generated around the issue of security in social networks, more specifically in Instagram and Facebook – now call Goal -.
Not only are users concerned about the protection of their personal data, but this has brought complications to the founder and CEO of Meta, mark zuckerbergwith governments: the company advanced before the European Union against the impossibility of transferring data from European users due to a court ruling that prevents it from sending this information to its headquarters in the United States.
In the midst of this context, Zuckerberg made a recommendation to platform users that are part of your company, regarding the security of personal data: do not take screenshots of conversations on Instagram and Facebook Messenger.
Although both platforms have a function that allows you to send temporary text messages – which disappear after being sent – the CEO pointed out that it is precisely about protecting users, so taking screenshots would be breaking privacy.
Apparently the CEO doesn’t think many people will heed the advice, so Meta is preparing for their platforms a interface that notifies the other person when you are taking a screenshot of the conversation.
Although nothing prevents the user from taking a picture with an external camera to keep a record of the chat, it is a great advance in order to protect the privacy of people, since it will not allow a completely instantaneous act that facilitates it.
“New update for end-to-end encrypted Messenger chats so you get notified if someone catches a message that disappears,” communication Zuckerberg, and said that they are also “adding GIFs, stickers, and reactions to encrypted chats.”
Facebook to pay $90 million for privacy breach
The company is about to lose a lawsuit in which it will have to pay the sum of 90 million dollars to a group of users for having violated its privacy in 2012.
the plaintiffs They denounced Facebook for following their movements —known as “tracking”— through “cookies”, even when they had completely disconnected from the platform. This is how they accused the firm led by Mark Zuckerberg of violating the privacy and illegal eavesdropping laws of the United States and the state of California.
This follow-up enabled the company to accumulate data on the tastes and activities of Internet users, very valuable information that constitutes a fundamental part of its lucrative advertising business.
If the court approves the agreement, the plaintiffs – it is unknown how many – will not only share the money but also the company shall delete all data of those users collected irregularly.
We would like to give thanks to the author of this write-up for this outstanding content
Mark Zuckerberg recommends against taking screenshots on Instagram and Facebook for this reason