The big technology companies have more power today than ever, and their organizations can be compared to large countries. How would the case of Google
Big tech like Google concentrate today more power than ever. Their disputes with states from all continents that try to prevent their monopolies are the order of the day. Like the legislative battles to get them to pay taxes in each territory. They are global, powerful companies with their own agenda that, due to their condition, are beginning to be able to confront the governments of certain states face to face. Between them, Alphabetand specifically Google, occupies a preponderant place for its role as oracle to which we all ask questions every day.
With a huge ecosystem that feeds its entire advertising industry, Alphabet is fed by four main legs: its Google search engine, the platform Youtubeyour browser Chrome and your mobile operating system, Androidgenerating a network that makes it one of the most powerful information centers in the world, if not the most.
But to understand their magnitude, it is better to compare them with what they are measured against. Here we will put Alphabet and Google in front of a mirror to understand their true weight in terms of influence, economics and, also, how it is directed.
Alphabet: an expansionist company (which would be a state)
Alphabet, the company that since 2015 has served as a holding company in which Google, YouTube and many other brands and companies are grouped, has become one of the largest technology conglomerates in the world, with a market capitalization of 1.75 billion dollars ( trillion, in North American terminology) as of March 2022. The company had net income of $76 billion on revenue of $257.6 billion in 2021.
As is known, most of Alphabet’s revenue is generated from advertising, a service that has guided many of its acquisition decisions, such as the purchase of Double Click in 2008.
The size of Google as a company assimilates it to existing countries
However, in recent years, with the intention of gaining independence from its main business, it has opened many other avenues with greater and lesser success. Alphabet is constantly looking for new technologies that can enrich its business portfolio. Acquiring smaller companies often eliminates emerging rivals, reducing competition for Alphabet.
This is one of the reasons why Alphabet is currently the subject of an antitrust lawsuit that was filed by the US Department of Justice and also by the European Union. In fact, Alphabet is known not only for acquiring, but also for discontinuing products with ease.
To get an idea of how Alphabet is much more than Google, YouTube or Android, these are other of its companies:
Waymo: autonomous mobility
Nest: home automation and home security
Fitbit: fitness wearables
Calico Y Verily: aging and health
deep mind: Artificial Intelligence
XDevelopment: Research in high-impact technologies, with Waymo, for example, coming out of it.
And with a tendency to technocracy
When we say technocracy we refer to the leadership of technicians. Larry Page and Sergey Brin, the founders of Google, always had a broader vision of the role of technology in the world. “Larry’s vision was always to be something like General Electric (GE), and Google was just their first proof of concept,” the New York Times is quoted. The reorganization that spawned Alphabet was Page and Brin’s attempt to streamline operations to focus energies on startups and make for Google to go from being a conglomerate.
Hence they delegated to Eric Schmidt to carry the position of CEO for almost 20 years, or the delegation in Sundar Pichai as the new CEO after his good work with Google Chrome.
Numbers: a wealth equivalent to almost all of Africa
Some data that help us to give an idea of the power of Google and Alphabet.
2 billion people have an Android phone
YouTube has 2.3 billion monthly users
5,600 Google searches are generated per day
1.5 billion active users of Gmail, your email service
For comparison, there are more people with an (and active) Gmail account than population in all of Africa, where there is an estimated population of 1.2 billion people.
Google’s numbers make it similar to almost all African countries
The comparison with the African continent also helps us economically. Alphabet’s market value is estimated at $1.7 trillion, the equivalent of more than 40 African states: the entire continent minus the wealthiest states like South Africa, Nigeria, Algeria either Egypt.
Even by number of employees, with 136,000, Google would have a larger population than 51 of the 244 internationally recognized countries.
An influence based on advertising and information
The book Everybody Lies, by the researcher Seth Stephens-Davidowitzwho investigated big data related to Google searches, revealed how our use of the search engine offers an enormous amount about us.
Part of this translates into how the level of power over the ad industry (historically the usual information partner) has shifted between tech, and specifically Google, and traditional media.
If its employees were citizens, with 136,000, Google would have a larger population than 51 of the 244 internationally recognized countries
Such has been the turn of the tables, that all the publicity generated by global television, press and other media such as radio are equal to or less than the weight of some of these companies alone. Only Google earns more from advertising than all the media in the world, and that taking into account YouTube broken off.
Google advertising revenue
A monopoly that it partly achieves by buying out its competitors
If Google were a country, it would pay significant sums of money to its borders to continue maintaining its position as a monopoly in many ways.
In a nutshell, it’s keeping you narrowing down your competition’s entry points to make your search engine the tip of your big money business: user data and advertising.
And how does Google achieve this? Well, as we already knew, many times paying other companies to place Google.com as the default search engine.
The agreement they maintain has been known for a long time Manzana and Google so that the Alphabet search engine is the default in Safari, the iOS browser, a direct entry route to the users of these devices and, de facto, the closing of the circle so that the mobile search is synonymous with going through Google, given its ownership of the other major smartphone operating system, Android.
The agreement between Google and Apple was renewed in 2017, although without giving specific figures for payments. An investigation in The New York Times based on the leaks of the lawsuit, raises that amount between 9,000 and 12,000 million dollars a year worldwide.
What does Google achieve with this? Well, directly eliminate layers of decision in the millions of users of Apple devices, and in practice, close that huge window so that another competitor can access it.
This kind of monopolistic circle might seem silly when we know that Google dominates more than 90% of world searches, but it is the center of the judgment that is to come: knowing how Google, after creating a product that works and convinces, uses that position of dominance to curb any possible competition from the base.
Another good paradox that the current technological market has left us is how Google, developer of Chrome, has managed to lower Firefox from the throne of browsers and at the same time pay it – less and less, yes, due precisely to its declining market rate – to that your search engine was also the default in your product.
Mozilla has always had this agreement as one of its main sources of financing, and it has not always been with Google. In 2015 and 2016, when Yahoo! he paid more than 470 million annually to the foundation so that his search engine was the predefined one. No need to remember how Yahoo! shortly after, indicated Hipertextual.
We would like to say thanks to the author of this short article for this awesome web content
Big tech size: what Google would look like if it were a country